Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
Site ActionsUse SHIFT+ENTER to open the menu (new window).Open Menu Navigate Up
Sign In

Quick Launch

   
View: 

1. Participant


Total: 0

2. The Course Design and Structure

  
Strongly Disagree
Neutral
Strongly Agree
(%)00154638
The objectives of the course are clear
     
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)00234631
The course is well-structured
     
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)00153154
The practical part of the content is supported well with relevant examples
     
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)00233146
Links with relevant disciplines (Engineering and non-engineering) is clear
     
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)0005446
Lecture and non-lecture content is well integrated
       
 
 
 
12345

Total: 13

3. Workload and Content

  
Strongly Disagree
Neutral
Strongly Agree
(%)08153838
The workload of the course is appropriate for the assigned credit hours.
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)0005446
I am confident that the subject content of the course is up-to-date
       
 
 
 
 12345
(%)8883838
Prerequisites to take the course are appropriate
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)8885423
There is not overlap with other courses in the program
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
12345

Total: 13

4. Resources

  
Strongly Disagree
Neutral
Strongly Agree
(%)08155423
Handouts are effectively designed to complement each lecture
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)015153831
The teaching resources (textbooks, handouts, and Web resources) are appropriate for the course
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)08235415
Reading lists and references are linked to reading resources that are readily available
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
12345

Total: 13

5. Instructors

  
Strongly Disagree
Neutral
Strongly Agree
(%)0082369
The instructor times the presentation of lectures effectively
     
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)0805438
The topics covered are explained well
   
 
   
 
 
 
 12345
(%)00154638
The use of teaching aids and media is appropriate
     
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)00154638
The instructor displayed a good knowledge of the subjects covered
     
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)0803162
The instructor motivates my interest in the subject.
   
 
   
 
 
 
 12345
(%)08152354
The instructor communicates the material effectively
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)0802369
The instructor is easily approachable following the lecture to answer questions (for example, personally or via email)
   
 
   
 
 
 
12345

Total: 13

6. Overall Quality

  
Strongly Disagree
Neutral
Strongly Agree
(%)0083854
I would recommend this course to other students
     
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)0083162
The course has motivated me to continue exploring the subject area
     
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)00233146
There is a positive atmosphere of ‘learning together’ in the lectures
     
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)0082369
This course is important for my career
     
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)0004654
The physical teaching and learning environment (lecture rooms, laboratories etc.) were of high quality
       
 
 
 
 12345
(%)8082362
The course has significantly increased my knowledge in the subject area
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)0082369
I am confident that I can apply what I have learned in the course
     
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)0084638
Examination standards were made clear in the lecture.
     
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)00153846
I was well-motivated to attend all lectures and activities on this course
     
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)08151554
Working and learning collaboratively in groups was actively encouraged
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
12345

Total: 13

7. Summary

  
Totally Disagree
Totally Agree
(%)0086231
The quality of the course is high.
     
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)8005438
I think that I have increased my knowledge through the lecture considerably.
 
 
     
 
 
 
 12345
(%)00152362
I think I can apply what I have learned in the lecture.
     
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)0084646
Examination standards were made clear in the lecture.
     
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)8084638
I assimilated the subject matter of this course mainly through the 1 = attending lecture 2 = attending exercises, 3 = reading script/ other handouts for the lecture, 4 = reading literature, 5 = working in learning group
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
12345

Total: 13

8. What recommendations would you make to further improve the course?

 We should learn to design a simple Power system with specific capacities.
 (8%) 
 
 the calculations of the inductance and the other parameter on the transmisssion lines
 (8%) 
 
 groups should never exceed two partners
 (8%) 
 
 the handouts should be more in the core of the practical part of the power system.
 (8%) 
 
 PSCAD should be replace with another program as it's sometimes inefficient and hard to deal with
 (8%) 
 
 none
 (8%) 
 
 at the first stage of the laboratory. We were missing more tutorial about PSCAD software. Also need more practical examples.
 (8%) 
 
 to concentrate more on Transmission problems we will face in the real life
 (8%) 
 
 each group should include two students only
 (8%) 
 
 simulation part
 (8%) 
 
 I think that each group should have at most 2 students not more.
 (8%) 
 
 The need to have Power Systems Course as a prerequisite is essential since many experiments required knowledge of late topics in that course
 (8%) 
 
 nothing
 (8%) 
 

Total: 13

9. What aspects of this course were most useful for you?

 Learning about faults in a power syste,.
 (8%) 
 
 all the other ones
 (8%) 
 
 PSCAD simulation
 (8%) 
 
 applying the practical part of the power system after we took the theoretical one.
 (8%) 
 
 The experimental part was more beneficial than the theoretical part of this course
 (8%) 
 
 Ferranti effect
 (8%) 
 
 the laboratory equipment's are new and high quality. learned new thing about PSCAD software.
 (8%) 
 
 We are dealing with new & up to date lab
 (8%) 
 
 observing what happens in real life in power systems
 (8%) 
 
 practical part
 (8%) 
 
 every subject in this course is valuable in my opinion. because its the heart of electrical power engineering.
 (8%) 
 
 The practical part really implemented the knowledge in both Power Systems and Power Systems Protection courses on the field.
 (8%) 
 
 nothing
 (8%) 
 

Total: 13