Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
Site ActionsUse SHIFT+ENTER to open the menu (new window).Open Menu Navigate Up
Sign In
   
View: 

1. Participant


Total: 0

2. The Course Design and Structure

  
Strongly Disagree
Neutral
Strongly Agree
(%)56191960
The objectives of the course are clear
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 12345
(%)44193160
The course is well-structured
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 12345
(%)44193160
The practical part of the content is supported well with relevant examples
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 12345
(%)50019196
Links with relevant disciplines (Engineering and non-engineering) is clear
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)50625190
Lecture and non-lecture content is well integrated
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
12345

Total: 16

3. Workload and Content

  
Strongly Disagree
Neutral
Strongly Agree
(%)311919310
The workload of the course is appropriate for the assigned credit hours.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 12345
(%)381231126
I am confident that the subject content of the course is up-to-date
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)311219316
Prerequisites to take the course are appropriate
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)3819191212
There is not overlap with other courses in the program
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
12345

Total: 16

4. Resources

  
Strongly Disagree
Neutral
Strongly Agree
(%)50192560
Handouts are effectively designed to complement each lecture
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 12345
(%)442512120
The teaching resources (textbooks, handouts, and Web resources) are appropriate for the course
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 12345
(%)441925120
Reading lists and references are linked to reading resources that are readily available
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
12345

Total: 16

5. Instructors

  
Strongly Disagree
Neutral
Strongly Agree
(%)44625196
The instructor times the presentation of lectures effectively
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)441219250
The topics covered are explained well
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 12345
(%)441212256
The use of teaching aids and media is appropriate
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)381225250
The instructor displayed a good knowledge of the subjects covered
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 12345
(%)441225126
The instructor motivates my interest in the subject.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)441225190
The instructor communicates the material effectively
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 12345
(%)56612250
The instructor is easily approachable following the lecture to answer questions (for example, personally or via email)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
12345

Total: 16

6. Overall Quality

  
Strongly Disagree
Neutral
Strongly Agree
(%)501212250
I would recommend this course to other students
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 12345
(%)56619126
The course has motivated me to continue exploring the subject area
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)56619612
There is a positive atmosphere of ‘learning together’ in the lectures
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)4463866
This course is important for my career
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12345
(%)38625310
The physical teaching and learning environment (lecture rooms, laboratories etc.) were of high quality
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 12345
(%)38644120
The course has significantly increased my knowledge in the subject area
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 12345
(%)381238120
I am confident that I can apply what I have learned in the course
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 12345
(%)441919190
Examination standards were made clear in the lecture.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 12345
(%)38638190
I was well-motivated to attend all lectures and activities on this course
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 12345
(%)50625190
Working and learning collaboratively in groups was actively encouraged
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
12345

Total: 16

7. Summary

  
Totally Disagree
Totally Agree
(%)381919250
The quality of the course is high.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 12345
(%)501219190
I think that I have increased my knowledge through the lecture considerably.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 12345
(%)44250256
I think I can apply what I have learned in the lecture.
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 12345
(%)50256190
Examination standards were made clear in the lecture.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 12345
(%)312519196
I assimilated the subject matter of this course mainly through the 1 = attending lecture 2 = attending exercises, 3 = reading script/ other handouts for the lecture, 4 = reading literature, 5 = working in learning group
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
12345

Total: 16

8. What recommendations would you make to further improve the course?

 The text book and materials The topics should be organised in a better way More the course must have more numerical examples
 (8%) 
 
 the syllabus of the course is not clear
 (8%) 
 
 nothing
 (8%) 
 
 there should be more practical work
 (8%) 
 
 this course is not clear
 (8%) 
 
 textbooks from Germany or USA or Great Britain are much preferred than indian textbooks.
 (8%) 
 
 Nothing in this course need to be improved.
 (8%) 
 
 
 (8%) 
 
  First thing should change the teacher thin determine the course material and the references.
 (8%) 
 
 the book
 (8%) 
 
 The curriculum needs to be revisited and more practical examples and better applications need to be added. The exams did not measure the student ability to apply, analyze, design or develop real-life applications, and was one of the weakest courses I had in PSUT. I highly recommend developing a better strategy in approaching this, including restructuring the curriculum
 (8%) 
 
 CONTROL OF DC MACHINES
 (8%) 
 

Total: 12

9. What aspects of this course were most useful for you?

 Control of all types of machines
 (8%) 
 
 the wind turbine and induction motor
 (8%) 
 
 nothing
 (8%) 
 
 the part about synchronous generators
 (8%) 
 
 hoe to control the dc machines
 (8%) 
 
 ... nothing I could make any benefit out of it.
 (8%) 
 
 All parts was valuable in my opinion.
 (8%) 
 
 
 (8%) 
 
 the 4 quadrant control in dc machines
 (8%) 
 
 motors
 (8%) 
 
 Some parts had added value but overall, really bad ratings
 (8%) 
 
 NONE
 (8%) 
 

Total: 12